Message 111224 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	andersk, bethard, eric.smith, r.david.murray
Date	2010-07-22.23:06:20
SpamBayes Score	0.009142068
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
It seems like reasonable request to me to be able to allow such arguments, especially since optparse did and we want people to be able to use argparse as a replacement. Though in general I find argparse's default behavior more useful. Since argparse has been released, I'm thinking this still has to be a feature request, since argparse is not a drop-in replacement for optparse.

It seems like reasonable request to me to be able to allow such arguments, especially since optparse did and we want people to be able to use argparse as a replacement. Though in general I find argparse's default behavior more useful.  Since argparse has been released, I'm thinking this still has to be a feature request, since argparse is *not* a drop-in replacement for optparse.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-07-22 23:06:22	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, bethard, eric.smith, andersk
2010-07-22 23:06:22	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-07-22 23:06:20	r.david.murray	link	issue9334 messages
2010-07-22 23:06:20	r.david.murray	create