Message 115309 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	stutzbach
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, gvanrossum, stutzbach
Date	2010-09-01.15:01:57
SpamBayes Score	0.0020532361
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Would it be useful to provide a separate function to perform the check, which could be used by lint-style tools as well as automated tests? It would be great if every call to .register in the standard library had a corresponding test that verified that the appropriate methods were defined. That would prevent future oversights where methods are missing entirely.

Would it be useful to provide a separate function to perform the check, which could be used by lint-style tools as well as automated tests?

It would be great if every call to .register in the standard library had a corresponding test that verified that the appropriate methods were defined.  That would prevent future oversights where methods are missing entirely.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-09-01 15:01:59	stutzbach	set	recipients: + stutzbach, gvanrossum, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo
2010-09-01 15:01:59	stutzbach	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-09-01 15:01:58	stutzbach	link	issue9731 messages
2010-09-01 15:01:57	stutzbach	create