Message 128072 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.smith
Recipients	andersk, bethard, drm, eric.araujo, eric.smith, gdb, nelhage, r.david.murray
Date	2011-02-06.19:33:14
SpamBayes Score	0.019129936
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Good point, I hadn't thought of that. Maybe ArgumentParser needs a "don't try to be so helpful, parse like optparse" option. Which is what Steven suggested earlier, I believe. I'd take a crack at this if there's general consensus on that solution. We can change the documentation to point out the issue now, but the feature request can only go in 3.3.

Good point, I hadn't thought of that. Maybe ArgumentParser needs a "don't try to be so helpful, parse like optparse" option. Which is what Steven suggested earlier, I believe.

I'd take a crack at this if there's general consensus on that solution.

We can change the documentation to point out the issue now, but the feature request can only go in 3.3.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2011-02-06 19:33:17	eric.smith	set	recipients: + eric.smith, bethard, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, andersk, gdb, nelhage, drm
2011-02-06 19:33:17	eric.smith	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2011-02-06 19:33:14	eric.smith	link	issue9334 messages
2011-02-06 19:33:14	eric.smith	create