Message 256895 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	llllllllll
Recipients	Arfrever, josh.r, llllllllll, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, taleinat
Date	2015-12-23.02:44:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> and the latter might give the impression it was some sort of special method/attribute when it was not. Wouldn't adding this be special because it is specifically reserved by CPython as an implementation detail? Also, would adding this name (__stub or __stub__) be sufficient to get this patch merged again. I would not mind investigating the gc_head issue after but I view that as a separate issue which is only exercised by this patch.

> and the latter might give the impression it was some sort of special method/attribute when it was not.

Wouldn't adding this be special because it is specifically reserved by CPython as an implementation detail?

Also, would adding this name (__stub or __stub__) be sufficient to get this patch merged again. I would not mind investigating the gc_head issue after but I view that as a separate issue which is only exercised by this patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-12-23 02:44:57	llllllllll	set	recipients: + llllllllll, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, taleinat, Arfrever, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r
2015-12-23 02:44:57	llllllllll	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2015-12-23 02:44:57	llllllllll	link	issue24379 messages
2015-12-23 02:44:57	llllllllll	create