Message 63064 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky
Date	2008-02-27.05:03:30
SpamBayes Score	0.046728205
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Hmm, it looks like this was considered before (issue402227), but back then there were no set literals. If stack-saving approach is better for dicts, it should be better for sets as well. In any case, maybe it is time to revisit the issue and decide on the best way to treat both set and dict literals. The truth may very well be that up to certain size it is better to build set/dict all at once from the stack, but past that size incremental insertion is better. The hybrid approach would be easy to implement.

Hmm, it looks like this was considered before (issue402227), but back 
then there were no set literals.  If stack-saving approach is better for 
dicts, it should be better for sets as well.  In any case, maybe it is 
time to revisit the issue and decide on the best way to treat both set 
and dict literals.  The truth may very well be that up to certain size 
it is better to build set/dict all at once from the stack, but past that 
size incremental insertion is better. The hybrid approach would be easy 
to implement.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-27 05:03:32	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.0467282 -> 0.046728205 recipients: + belopolsky
2008-02-27 05:03:31	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.0467282 -> 0.0467282 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-02-27 05:03:31	belopolsky	link	issue2197 messages
2008-02-27 05:03:30	belopolsky	create