@avbel , we should be able to add @smitchell2240 's client creation code for iris as part of the _init_.py file now? Right?

We will have to move some files around to match the most excellent project structure you have. But over all, so long as we export the created iris client when requested, all of the iris functionality should follow that client.

We'll talk more about the merge on Wednesday during our meeting. Basically, we don't need the IRIS methods and the Catapult methods to function the same, nor even look the same. However, we should be able to create both the IRIS client and the Catapult client from the same 'SDK'. And the end user can combine the methods as they see fit.

Yes. Right.

15 нояб. 2016 г. 12:43 ДП пользователь "Daniel Tolbert" <
[email protected]> написал:

@avbel https://github.com/avbel , we should be able to add
@smitchell2240 https://github.com/smitchell2240 's client creation code
for iris as part of the init.py
https://github.com/Bandwidth/python-bandwidth/blob/boto3-style-catapult/bandwidth/__init__.py
file now? Right?

https://github.com/Bandwidth/python-bandwidth/blob/steve-
working/bandwidth_sdk/client.py#L136

We will probably have to move some files around. But over all, so long as
we export the created iris client when requested, all of the iris
functionality should follow that client.

We'll talk more about the merge on Wednesday during our meeting.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#2 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6MnHm9JcnxBCCkLhlzizRv6cuuWJFXks5q-NYSgaJpZM4KxYqm
.